architect: use calculus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use calculus 1.00
use algebra 0.83
use math 0.81
use trigonometry 0.80
need trigonometry 0.80
need math 0.78
know math 0.78
relate to math 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, use calculus)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, use calculus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use calculus)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(architect, use calculus)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(architect, use calculus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(engineer, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(engineer, use calculus)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(builder, use algebra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(architect, use calculus)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(architect, use algebra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architect, use math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(architect, relate to math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architect, need math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, need math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(architect, relate to math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(architect, know math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, relate to math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architect, know math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, need math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, relate to math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, use trigonometry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(architect, use trigonometry)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(architect, use trigonometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, use calculus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(engineer, use calculus)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(builder, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(architect, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)