engineer: need math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need math 1.00
need much math 0.97
use math 0.96
know math 0.95
have good at math 0.93
need mathematics 0.92
use math in jobs 0.89
use algebra 0.85
use maths 0.82
need calculus 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(architect, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(physicist, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(physicist, use math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(architect, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, need math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(architect, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architect, know math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(engineer, need math)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(engineer, use math)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(engineer, use algebra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(engineer, use maths)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use maths)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, need math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(physicist, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)