architect: need trigonometry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need trigonometry 1.00
use trigonometry 0.98
use algebra 0.86
need math 0.84
use math 0.83
know math 0.82
use calculus 0.80
relate to math 0.78
need physics 0.77
use geometry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use calculus)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(builder, use algebra)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(engineer, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(engineer, use calculus)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, need trigonometry)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(architect, use algebra)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architect, use math)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architect, need math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, need math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, use trigonometry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(architect, know math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architect, know math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(architect, use calculus)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(architect, relate to math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(architect, use trigonometry)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, need math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(architect, relate to math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(architect, use calculus)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(architect, use trigonometry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, relate to math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, use calculus)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, relate to math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, need physics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(architect, need physics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(architect, use geometry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(architect, use geometry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(architect, use geometry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(architect, need physics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(builder, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(engineer, use calculus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)