architect: need physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need physics 1.00
need math 0.78
need trigonometry 0.77
use math 0.75
use geometry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, need physics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(architect, need physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(architect, need physics)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architect, use math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architect, need math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, need math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, need math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(architect, use geometry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(architect, use geometry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(architect, use geometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, need physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(architect, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)