architect: use geometry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use geometry 1.00
use trigonometry 0.79
need trigonometry 0.76
use math 0.75
need physics 0.75
use algebra 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(architect, use geometry)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(architect, use geometry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(architect, use geometry)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(architect, use geometry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(builder, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(builder, use algebra)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(architect, use geometry)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(architect, use algebra)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architect, use math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, need physics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, use trigonometry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(architect, need physics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(architect, use trigonometry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(architect, use trigonometry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(architect, need physics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, need physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(architect, use geometry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(builder, use algebra)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(architect, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)