construction worker: use geometry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, project
Weight: 0.67
, contractor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.70
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, roofer
Weight: 0.63
, mason
Weight: 0.63
, electrician
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
use geometry 1.00
use math 0.75
use algebra 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(electrician, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(construction worker, use geometry)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(construction worker, use algebra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(construction worker, use math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(construction worker, use geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)