electrician: need science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need science 1.00
use science 0.94
be in atmospheric science 0.80
use physics 0.78
use math 0.78
require education 0.76
need work 0.75
be important in engineering 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(job, require education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mechanic, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, need work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mechanic, use science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mechanic, use math)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(job, require education)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(job, require education)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in engineering)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mechanic, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(electrician, need science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(electrician, need science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(electrician, need science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(job, require education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(electrician, need science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(electrician, need science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, need work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(electrician, need science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(electrician, need science)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(electrician, use science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electrician, use math)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(electrician, use science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(electrician, use science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(electrician, use physics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(electrician, use physics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use physics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(electrician, use physics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(electrician, need science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mechanic, use science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(job, require education)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mechanic, use science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(job, require education)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(electrician, need science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering)