electrician: use wires of different thickness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use wires of different thickness 1.00
use wires of thickness 0.99
use wires 0.84
prefer wires 0.80
prefer black wires 0.79
use copper wire instead of wire 0.77
use geometry 0.76
cover cut with coloured waterproof plaster 0.75
cover cut with waterproof plaster 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, cover cut with coloured waterproof plaster)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(worker, cover cut with coloured waterproof plaster)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(worker, cover cut with coloured waterproof plaster)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, cover cut with coloured waterproof plaster)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(electrician, use wires of different thickness)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use wires of thickness)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(electrician, use wires of thickness)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(electrician, use wires of thickness)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(electrician, prefer black wires)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(electrician, use wires of thickness)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use wires)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electrician, prefer wires)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(electrician, use wires)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use copper wire instead of wire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(electrician, use wires)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(electrician, use wires)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(electrician, prefer wires)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(electrician, prefer black wires)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(electrician, use copper wire instead of wire)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(electrician, use copper wire instead of wire)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electrician, prefer wires)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(electrician, use copper wire instead of wire)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(electrician, prefer wires)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(electrician, prefer black wires)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(electrician, prefer black wires)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(worker, cover cut with coloured waterproof plaster)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(electrician, use wires of different thickness)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(worker, cover cut with coloured waterproof plaster)