electrician: wear slippers working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear slippers working 1.00
wear hats 0.83
wear pants 0.82
wear rubber shoes 0.82
wear hard hats 0.82
is wear gloves 0.81
wear rubber type shoes 0.81
wear overalls 0.81
wear rubber gloves at work 0.80
wear rubber boots 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(construction worker, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(construction worker, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mechanic, wear overalls)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mechanic, wear overalls)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear pants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear pants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, wear overalls)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(construction worker, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(construction worker, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mechanic, wear overalls)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(carpenter, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carpenter, wear pants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(electrician, wear hats)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear rubber gloves at work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(electrician, wear overalls)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear rubber type shoes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear rubber shoes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electrician, is wear gloves)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electrician, wear hard hats)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear rubber boots)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(electrician, wear rubber boots)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(electrician, wear rubber gloves at work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(electrician, wear rubber shoes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(electrician, wear pants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(electrician, wear rubber type shoes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear pants)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear hard hats)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(electrician, is wear gloves)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear hats)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear rubber gloves at work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear overalls)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear hats)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear rubber boots)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear overalls)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear rubber shoes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear hard hats)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electrician, is wear gloves)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear rubber type shoes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(electrician, wear pants)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(electrician, wear rubber gloves at work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(electrician, wear rubber boots)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(electrician, wear rubber shoes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(electrician, wear rubber type shoes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(electrician, wear hats)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(electrician, wear overalls)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(electrician, wear hard hats)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(electrician, is wear gloves)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(electrician, wear pants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hats)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mechanic, wear overalls)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(carpenter, wear pants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hats)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mechanic, wear overalls)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, wear slippers working)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear pants)