electronic: is medical records

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.59
, format
Weight: 0.53
, method
Weight: 0.49
, form
Weight: 0.49
, medium
Weight: 0.48
Siblings electronic device
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is medical records 1.00
is medical records important 0.99
is records 0.91
is records important 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(electronic, is medical records)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(electronic, is medical records important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(electronic, is records)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(electronic, is records)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(electronic, is records important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electronic, is medical records important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(electronic, is records)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electronic, is records important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(electronic, is medical records important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is medical records important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(electronic, is records important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is medical records)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(electronic, is medical records)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(electronic, is medical records)