electronics: get slower

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.69
, merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar cell
Weight: 0.65
, resistor
Weight: 0.55
, ballast
Weight: 0.52
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get slower 1.00
get slower with less power 0.91
slow down over time 0.80
was slow in south 0.77
get smaller 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, was slow in south)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(electronics, get slower)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(electronics, get slower)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(industry, was slow in south)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, was slow in south)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get smaller)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, was slow in south)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(electronics, get slower)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get smaller)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(electronics, get slower)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(electronics, get slower)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(electronics, slow down over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(electronics, slow down over time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, slow down over time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, get slower)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(electronics, get slower)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(electronic device, get smaller)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(electronic device, get smaller)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(electronics, get slower)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)