electronics: slow down over time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.69
, merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar cell
Weight: 0.65
, resistor
Weight: 0.55
, ballast
Weight: 0.52
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
slow down over time 1.00
get over time 0.85
was slow in south 0.83
fail over time 0.80
get slower 0.80
get slower with less power 0.79
working over time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(electronic device, get over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, slow down over time)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, was slow in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, slow down over time)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get over time)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(industry, was slow in south)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, was slow in south)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get over time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(electronic device, get over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(electronics, slow down over time)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, was slow in south) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(electronics, slow down over time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(electronics, slow down over time)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(electronics, get over time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(electronics, get slower)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(electronics, get slower)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, get slower)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(electronics, get over time)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(electronics, get slower)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(electronics, get over time)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(electronics, get over time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electronics, slow down over time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(electronic device, get over time)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(electronic device, get over time)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electronics, slow down over time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)