elevation: be represented on topographic map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, attribute
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings altitude
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33
, gradient
Weight: 0.33
, height
Weight: 0.32
, density
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be represented on topographic map 1.00
be represented on map 0.87
be determined on contour map 0.83
be vertically exaggerated on cross map 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(elevation, be represented on topographic map)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(elevation, be represented on map)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(elevation, be represented on map)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(elevation, be represented on map)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be represented on map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be represented on topographic map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(elevation, be represented on topographic map)