elevation: be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, attribute
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings altitude
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33
, gradient
Weight: 0.33
, height
Weight: 0.32
, density
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map 1.00
be vertically exaggerated on cross map 0.93
be determined on contour map 0.77
be perpendicular to level curve 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gradient, be perpendicular to level curve)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gradient, be perpendicular to level curve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(gradient, be perpendicular to level curve)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gradient, be perpendicular to level curve)