elvis: was best

Property	Similarity
was best	1.00
is best	0.96
was presley important in 1960s	0.78
was presley important in 1967	0.78
was presly remeberd	0.77
was presley famase	0.77
was presley	0.77
was great performer	0.76
has quality good	0.76
was different	0.76

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(elvis, was presley)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(elvis, was presly remeberd)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(elvis, was presley famase)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley famase)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(elvis, was presly remeberd)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(elvis, was presley famase)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(elvis, was presly remeberd)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(elvis, was presley important in 1967)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(elvis, was presley)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(elvis, was different)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(elvis, was presley important in 1967)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley important in 1967)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(elvis, was different)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(elvis, was different)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley famase)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley important in 1967)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(elvis, was different)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presly remeberd)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(elvis, was best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley)

Parents	legend Weight: 0.66 , entertainer Weight: 0.65 , icon Weight: 0.64 , musician Weight: 0.62 , performer Weight: 0.60
Siblings	michael jackson Weight: 0.36 , billy joel Weight: 0.36 , louis armstrong Weight: 0.36 , stephen king Weight: 0.36

elvis: was best

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings