employee: be called internal customers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called internal customers 1.00
be called customers 0.91
be hostile to customers 0.80
is internal stakeholders 0.78
result in employees 0.76
is employees 0.76
be employees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(employee, be called internal customers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(partner, be employees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(partner, be employees)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is employees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(partner, be employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(employee, be called internal customers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(construction worker, is employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is employees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(employee, be called internal customers)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(employee, be called customers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be called customers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(employee, be called customers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, be called customers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be called internal customers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(employee, be called internal customers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(partner, be employees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(construction worker, is employees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(employee, be called internal customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(partner, be employees)