employee: enjoy work benefit

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
enjoy work benefit 1.00
be go to work 0.77
be at work 0.77
work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(creditor, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(driver, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(creditor, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(driver, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(employee, enjoy work benefit)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be at work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be go to work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(employee, be at work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(employee, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(employee, be go to work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employee, be at work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(employee, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)