employee: need understand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
need understand 1.00
need know 0.91
understand requirements 0.85
need work 0.80
want work 0.80
understand legislative requirements 0.78
want anyway byod 0.78
make sure 0.78
know from experience 0.77
ask try 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(officer, know from experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(officer, know from experience)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(officer, know from experience)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(waiter, ask try)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(officer, know from experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(employee, need understand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(construction worker, need work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(waiter, ask try) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waiter, ask try)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(employee, need understand)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, understand requirements)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(employee, understand legislative requirements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(employee, understand requirements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(employee, understand requirements)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(employee, understand requirements)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, understand legislative requirements)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(employee, understand legislative requirements)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(employee, understand legislative requirements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(officer, know from experience)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(waiter, ask try)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(employee, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(officer, know from experience)