employee: understand requirements

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
understand requirements 1.00
know requirements 0.96
understand legislative requirements 0.90
understand requirements as contract law 0.88
know legislative requirements 0.85
need understand 0.85
understand legislative requirements as contract law 0.84
need know 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(employee, understand requirements)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(employee, understand legislative requirements)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(employee, understand legislative requirements as contract law)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, understand legislative requirements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(employee, need understand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(employee, need understand)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(employee, understand legislative requirements)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(employee, understand legislative requirements)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(employee, understand legislative requirements as contract law)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(employee, understand legislative requirements as contract law)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(employee, understand legislative requirements as contract law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, understand requirements)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(employee, understand requirements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(employee, understand requirements)