employee: wear uniforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear uniforms 1.00
buy uniforms 0.93
wear uniform 0.92
wear shirts 0.90
buy own uniforms 0.89
wear helmets 0.88
have wear 0.87
wear hats 0.87
wear hawaiian shirts 0.86
wear vests 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear shirts)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear helmets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear vests)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear uniform)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear vests)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(waiter, wear uniform) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear uniform)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(waiter, wear vests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear vests)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(construction worker, wear shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear shirts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(construction worker, wear helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear helmets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(construction worker, wear vests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear vests)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(employee, wear uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(waiter, wear uniform)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(waiter, wear vests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hats)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hawaiian shirts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear shirts)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear helmets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear vests)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)