officer: buy own uniforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
buy own uniforms 1.00
buy uniforms 0.97
have uniforms 0.90
wear uniforms 0.89
have blue uniforms 0.88
wear blue uniforms 0.88
wear shirts 0.79
wear white shirts 0.79
wear hats 0.77
have wear 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(police officer, wear blue uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(police officer, have blue uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(police officer, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(police officer, have blue uniforms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear blue uniforms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(police officer, have wear)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, have blue uniforms)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear blue uniforms)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(police officer, have wear)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(executive, wear white shirts)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(executive, wear shirts)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(police officer, wear blue uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(police officer, have blue uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(police officer, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(executive, wear shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(executive, wear shirts)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(executive, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(executive, wear white shirts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(officer, buy own uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(officer, buy own uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(police officer, have wear)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, have blue uniforms)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear blue uniforms)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(executive, wear shirts)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(executive, wear white shirts)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, have blue uniforms)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear blue uniforms)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(police officer, have wear)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(officer, buy own uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)