emu: has physical part wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.70
, wildlife
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.57
, animal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, turkey
Weight: 0.36
, rabbit
Weight: 0.36
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, pelican
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wings 1.00
have small wings 0.88
has physical part eyes 0.81
has physical part necks 0.76
has physical part neck 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(emu, has physical part wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(emu, has physical part wings)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(emu, have small wings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(emu, have small wings)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(emu, have small wings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part eyes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(emu, have small wings)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(emu, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(emu, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(emu, has physical part eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part neck)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part necks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(emu, has physical part neck)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(emu, has physical part neck)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(emu, has physical part neck)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(emu, has physical part necks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(emu, has physical part necks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(emu, has physical part necks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(emu, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(emu, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)