emulation: is quality

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.54 , thing Weight: 0.50 , method Weight: 0.48 , matter Weight: 0.46 , time Weight: 0.45
Siblings	simulation Weight: 0.31 , bittorrent Weight: 0.31 , compatibility Weight: 0.31 , synthesis Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is quality	1.00
has quality good	0.91
has quality wrong	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(emulation, is quality)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(emulation, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(program, is quality)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(simulation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(program, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(emulation, is quality)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(emulation, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(simulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(simulation, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(emulation, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(emulation, has quality good)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(emulation, has quality wrong)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(emulation, has quality wrong)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(emulation, has quality wrong)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(emulation, has quality good)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(emulation, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(emulation, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(simulation, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(program, is quality)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(emulation, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)