enamel: be harder than dentin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.61
, paint
Weight: 0.57
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.55
, metal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, varnish
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.34
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.34
, shellac
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder than dentin 1.00
be harder than cementum 0.89
be harder than bone 0.80
be stronger than bone 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(enamel, be harder than dentin)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(enamel, be harder than cementum)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than cementum)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(enamel, be harder than cementum)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be harder than cementum)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than bone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(enamel, be harder than bone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(enamel, be harder than bone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be harder than bone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be harder than dentin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(enamel, be harder than dentin)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than dentin)