endangered species: be bad act

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, wildlife
Weight: 0.62
, conservation
Weight: 0.62
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, bald eagle
Weight: 0.71
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.70
, giant panda
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad act 1.00
be act good 0.96
be important act 0.90
act 1973 controversial 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(endangered species, be bad act)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be act good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(endangered species, be act good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be act good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(endangered species, be act good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be important act)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(endangered species, be important act)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be important act)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(endangered species, be important act)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be bad act)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(endangered species, be bad act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(endangered species, be bad act)