endangered species: be important act

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, wildlife
Weight: 0.62
, conservation
Weight: 0.62
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, bald eagle
Weight: 0.71
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.70
, giant panda
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important act 1.00
be act good 0.93
be bad act 0.90
act 1973 controversial 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(endangered species, be important act)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(endangered species, be act good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be act good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be act good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(endangered species, be bad act)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(endangered species, be act good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(endangered species, be bad act)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be bad act)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be bad act)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(endangered species, act 1973 controversial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be important act)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be important act) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(endangered species, be important act)