endangered species: be more vulnerable to changes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, wildlife
Weight: 0.62
, conservation
Weight: 0.62
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, bald eagle
Weight: 0.71
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.70
, giant panda
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more vulnerable to changes 1.00
be more vulnerable to environmental changes 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)