endangered species: be more vulnerable to environmental changes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, wildlife
Weight: 0.62
, conservation
Weight: 0.62
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.58
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, bald eagle
Weight: 0.71
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.70
, giant panda
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more vulnerable to environmental changes 1.00
be more vulnerable to changes 0.93
affect environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(endangered species, affect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(endangered species, affect environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to changes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(endangered species, affect environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(endangered species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(species, be more vulnerable to environmental changes)