energy: be constant for satellite in circular orbit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be constant for satellite in circular orbit 1.00
be constant for satellite in orbit 0.97
be constant for satellite 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)