kinetic energy: be constant for satellite

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, force
Weight: 0.61
, energy
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.56
Siblings thermal energy
Weight: 0.69
, solar energy
Weight: 0.38
, solar wind
Weight: 0.33
, power
Weight: 0.33
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be constant for satellite 1.00
be constant for satellite in orbit 0.93
be constant for satellite in circular orbit 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in orbit)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(kinetic energy, be constant for satellite) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(energy, be constant for satellite in circular orbit)