engine: backfire under hard excelleration

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents search engine
Weight: 0.83
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.71
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.71
, machine
Weight: 0.68
Siblings steam engine
Weight: 0.81
, internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.75
, torque
Weight: 0.61
, oil change
Weight: 0.57
, exhaust
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
backfire under hard excelleration 1.00
backfire under acceleration 0.90
is hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(diesel engine, is hard)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(diesel engine, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(diesel engine, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(diesel engine, is hard)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(engine, backfire under acceleration)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(engine, backfire under acceleration)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(engine, backfire under acceleration)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(engine, backfire under acceleration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diesel engine, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(engine, backfire under hard excelleration)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diesel engine, is hard)