engineer: use design process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use design process 1.00
evaluate designs 0.80
designing ship 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(engineer, use design process)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(engineer, evaluate designs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineer, designing ship)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(engineer, evaluate designs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(engineer, evaluate designs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(engineer, evaluate designs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(engineer, designing ship)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(engineer, designing ship)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(engineer, designing ship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use design process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use design process)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(engineer, use design process)