engineering: is most popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is most popular 1.00
is popular 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(design, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(design, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(design, is popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(computer science, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(engineering, is most popular)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(engineering, is popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(engineering, is popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(engineering, is popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is most popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(engineering, is most popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(design, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is most popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is popular)