england: be similar to canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, europe
Weight: 0.68
, italy
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, world
Weight: 0.61
Siblings spain
Weight: 0.38
, france
Weight: 0.37
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, sweden
Weight: 0.36
, britain
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar to canada 1.00
be connected to india 0.75
dominate uk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(britain, be connected to india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(britain, be connected to india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(england, be similar to canada)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(england, dominate uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(england, dominate uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(england, be connected to india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(england, dominate uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(england, dominate uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(england, be connected to india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(england, be connected to india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be connected to india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(england, be similar to canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(england, be similar to canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(england, be similar to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(britain, be connected to india)