environment: was important to native americans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.63
, theme
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mining
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.33
, ecology
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, financial institution
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to native americans 1.00
be towards americans 0.82
be important to europeans 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tool, be towards americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(environment, was important to native americans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tool, be towards americans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tool, be towards americans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to europeans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tool, be towards americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(environment, was important to native americans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(industry, be important to europeans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to europeans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(environment, was important to native americans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(environment, was important to native americans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(environment, was important to native americans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tool, be towards americans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(industry, be important to europeans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(environment, was important to native americans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tool, be towards americans)