eosinophil: has quality function

Related concepts

Parents	white blood cell Weight: 0.61 , immune system Weight: 0.49 , leukocyte Weight: 0.48 , inflammation Weight: 0.45 , lymphocyte Weight: 0.42
Siblings	neutrophil Weight: 0.36 , red blood cell Weight: 0.36 , monocyte Weight: 0.36 , stem cell Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality function	1.00
has quality functions	0.91
has quality good	0.78
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(leukocyte, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(leukocyte, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(leukocyte, has quality function)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(leukocyte, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)

...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(leukocyte, has quality function)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(lymphocyte, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(leukocyte, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(lymphocyte, has quality good)

...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(neutrophil, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(leukocyte, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(leukocyte, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)

...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(neutrophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(neutrophil, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(eosinophil, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality functions)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(eosinophil, has quality functions)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality functions)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality bad)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality function)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(lymphocyte, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)

...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(neutrophil, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality function)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(lymphocyte, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(eosinophil, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)

...