eosinophil: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white blood cell
Weight: 0.61
, immune system
Weight: 0.49
, leukocyte
Weight: 0.48
, inflammation
Weight: 0.45
, lymphocyte
Weight: 0.42
Siblings neutrophil
Weight: 0.36
, red blood cell
Weight: 0.36
, monocyte
Weight: 0.36
, stem cell
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
has quality functions 0.91
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(leukocyte, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(leukocyte, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(leukocyte, has quality function)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(leukocyte, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(leukocyte, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lymphocyte, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leukocyte, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lymphocyte, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(neutrophil, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(leukocyte, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(leukocyte, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lymphocyte, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(neutrophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(neutrophil, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(eosinophil, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality functions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(eosinophil, has quality functions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality functions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality functions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(eosinophil, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(eosinophil, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(eosinophil, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality function)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lymphocyte, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lymphocyte, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(neutrophil, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality function)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lymphocyte, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leukocyte, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(eosinophil, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lymphocyte, has quality bad)