equilibrium: be stable in dominant strategies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, movie
Weight: 0.52
Siblings harmony
Weight: 0.32
, elasticity
Weight: 0.32
, singularity
Weight: 0.31
, cohesion
Weight: 0.31
, duality
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stable in dominant strategies 1.00
be stable in strategies 0.94
is stable 0.82
be important in dynamics 0.77
be considered dynamic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be stable in strategies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be stable in strategies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be stable in strategies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is stable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is stable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is stable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in strategies)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is stable)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be stable in dominant strategies)