equipment: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, step
Weight: 0.60
, information
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fax machine
Weight: 0.74
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.72
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.71
, lawn mower
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
become expensive 0.91
become more expensive 0.88
be much cheaper than tvs 0.77
be cheaper than tvs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(step, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(step, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(step, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lawn mower, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(step, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fax machine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fax machine, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lawn mower, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lawn mower, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(equipment, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(equipment, become expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equipment, become expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(equipment, become expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(equipment, become more expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(equipment, become more expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(equipment, become more expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(equipment, become expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(equipment, become more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lawn mower, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fax machine, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, is expensive)