computer monitor: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.81
, electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, device
Weight: 0.74
, equipment
Weight: 0.72
Siblings lcd
Weight: 0.58
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer network
Weight: 0.40
, personal computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer program
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be more expensive than tv 0.81
be more expensive than than tv 0.80
be more expensive than tvs 0.79
be much cheaper than tvs 0.77
be cheaper than tvs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lcd, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lcd, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lcd, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(computer monitor, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lcd, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(computer monitor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)