computer monitor: be more expensive than tv

Related concepts

Parents	computer Weight: 0.81 , electronic device Weight: 0.79 , device Weight: 0.74 , equipment Weight: 0.72
Siblings	lcd Weight: 0.58 , laptop computer Weight: 0.40 , computer network Weight: 0.40 , personal computer Weight: 0.40 , computer program Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than tv	1.00
be more expensive than than tv	0.99
be better than tv	0.93
be more expensive than tvs	0.90
be much cheaper than tvs	0.87
be cheaper than tvs	0.86
be better than tvs	0.84
look better than tvs	0.83
is expensive	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(computer, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(lcd, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(computer, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(lcd, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(lcd, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(computer monitor, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(lcd, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)