computer monitor: be better than tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.81
, electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, device
Weight: 0.74
, equipment
Weight: 0.72
Siblings lcd
Weight: 0.58
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer network
Weight: 0.40
, personal computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer program
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than tv 1.00
be more expensive than tv 0.93
be more expensive than than tv 0.92
be better than tvs 0.87
look better than tvs 0.86
be much cheaper than tvs 0.83
be more expensive than tvs 0.83
be cheaper than tvs 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)