computer monitor: look better than tvs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.81
, electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, device
Weight: 0.74
, equipment
Weight: 0.72
Siblings lcd
Weight: 0.58
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer network
Weight: 0.40
, personal computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer program
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
look better than tvs 1.00
be better than tvs 0.98
be more expensive than tvs 0.94
be much cheaper than tvs 0.94
be cheaper than tvs 0.94
be better than tv 0.86
be more expensive than tv 0.83
be more expensive than than tv 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)