computer monitor: be more expensive than tvs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.81
, electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, device
Weight: 0.74
, equipment
Weight: 0.72
Siblings lcd
Weight: 0.58
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer network
Weight: 0.40
, personal computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer program
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than tvs 1.00
be cheaper than tvs 0.97
be much cheaper than tvs 0.97
be better than tvs 0.96
look better than tvs 0.94
be more expensive than tv 0.90
be more expensive than than tv 0.90
be better than tv 0.83
is expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lcd, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lcd, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lcd, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(computer monitor, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lcd, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is expensive)