eric: was liddell special

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
, tool
Weight: 0.53
, actor
Weight: 0.52
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, john smith
Weight: 0.35
, adam smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was liddell special 1.00
was special 0.90
was liddell 0.87
was famous liddell 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(eric, was liddell special)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(eric, was liddell)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(eric, was liddell)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(eric, was liddell)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eric, was special)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(eric, was special)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(eric, was special)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eric, was famous liddell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(eric, was famous liddell)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(eric, was famous liddell)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(eric, was liddell)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(eric, was special)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(eric, was famous liddell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(eric, was liddell special)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(eric, was liddell special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eric, was liddell special)