eric: was special

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
, tool
Weight: 0.53
, actor
Weight: 0.52
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, john smith
Weight: 0.35
, adam smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was special 1.00
was liddell special 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(eric, was special)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(eric, was liddell special)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eric, was liddell special)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(eric, was liddell special)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(eric, was liddell special)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(eric, was special)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(eric, was special) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eric, was special)