erosion: affect resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, process
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.59
, damage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect resources 1.00
affect landpeopleplants 0.78
affect areas 0.78
affect environment 0.77
affect water quality 0.77
affect land 0.76
affect future 0.76
affect people 0.76
affect community 0.75
affect things 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(desertification, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(erosion, affect resources)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect land)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(erosion, affect environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(erosion, affect land)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect land)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(erosion, affect land)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(erosion, affect environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(erosion, affect people)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(erosion, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(erosion, affect resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect resources)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(desertification, affect environment)