erosion: affect people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, process
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.59
, damage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect people 1.00
affect people life 0.93
affect others 0.91
affects people 0.90
affect landpeopleplants 0.90
affect things 0.86
affect community 0.84
affect animals 0.83
affect living things 0.83
affects animals 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(erosion, affect people)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect others)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(erosion, affect others)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect people life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(erosion, affect people life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(erosion, affect animals)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(erosion, affect people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect people)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)