erosion: affect others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, process
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.59
, damage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect others 1.00
affect people 0.91
affect landpeopleplants 0.88
affect people life 0.86
affect things 0.86
affect living things 0.81
affect future 0.81
affects people 0.81
affect areas 0.81
affect animals 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(erosion, affect others)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(erosion, affect people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(erosion, affect animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(erosion, affect people life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(erosion, affect people)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(erosion, affect others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(erosion, affect others)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)