erosion: be dangerous to mankind

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, process
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.59
, damage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to mankind 1.00
be dangerous 0.78
be bad for earth 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(desertification, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(desertification, be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(erosion, be dangerous to mankind)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(erosion, be bad for earth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(erosion, be bad for earth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(erosion, be dangerous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(erosion, be dangerous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(erosion, be dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous to mankind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(erosion, be dangerous to mankind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous to mankind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(desertification, be dangerous)