erosion: be bad for earth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, process
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.59
, damage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for earth 1.00
help earth 0.89
be dangerous to mankind 0.78
be bad for environment 0.78
be consider as bad thing 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
wears down earth surface 0.76
be bad for animal life 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fragmentation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fragmentation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tooth decay, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tooth decay, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(decline, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(erosion, be bad for earth)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(erosion, help earth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(erosion, help earth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(erosion, help earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(erosion, help earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(erosion, wears down earth surface)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(erosion, wears down earth surface)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(erosion, wears down earth surface)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(erosion, wears down earth surface)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for animal life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be dangerous to mankind)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(erosion, be dangerous to mankind)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(erosion, be bad for animal life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(erosion, be dangerous to mankind)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(erosion, be dangerous to mankind)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(erosion, be bad for animal life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(erosion, be bad for animal life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(erosion, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(erosion, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(erosion, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(erosion, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(erosion, be bad for earth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fragmentation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tooth decay, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be bad for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decline, has quality bad)